Actually you know what. Not MAYBE. NOT PROBABLY.
You. Dont. Know. How. To. Interview. PERIOD.
What exactly were you doing in Rounds 1 through 7?
- Admiring their Zoom background?
- Evaluating their WiFi connection stability instead of their actual skills?
- Collecting meaningless INSIGHTS that lead to absolutely NOTHING?
And THEN, after dragging the candidate through this circus of incompetence, you wake up in Round 8 and go: "Hmmm, we're worried about their stability…"
Are you serious???
At this point, WHO is actually unstable here? The candidate? Or the company that wasted two months to make a decision that should have taken 30 minutes?
If STABILITY was a concern, that should have been addressed DAY ONE. Not when the candidate has already spent HOURS playing your multi-level interview pacman.
You know what this tells me?
- You and your hiring team has no clue what you/they are looking for
- Your decision-makers are spineless. They can’t say NO early, so they drag it out until someone else does it for them
- Your process is BROKEN. It’s not THOROUGH.. it's a slow-motion car crash
The way I see it - "STABILITY" - a word that bends, twists, and shape-shifts depending on who's holding the mic. One day, it means loyalty. The next, it means adaptability. Then suddenly, it's being clueless. Then it's risk-taking, but not too much. And before you know it, it's just a lazy excuse to reject someone when you've run out of real reasons
Mull on that.