img

3 things orgs and recruiters love to rant about

Majority of them will scream these at the top of their lungs - How candidates are taking their offers and not joining after notice period - The unrealistic expectations of candidates - The mismatch between resumes and actual skills but they will never talk about: - How they did not honor the offers they made. They won't discuss the internal discussions that led to the decision to rescind the offer, nor they will acknowledge the impact it had on the candidate's career and mental health nor will they apologize publically for the harm caused - The 10 rounds of interviews they need to check all of the "I NEED" boxes - How they operate at will and won't explain why they leave candidates guessing about the status, progress or outcome of their application - Lowballing offers then "magically" finding the budget they always had after negotiations - How they look down on anyone who comes back for counteroffer: Because insulting someone's worth twice is clearly the answer. They wont talk about talent density, candidate experience - clearly they don't understand that. and Culture .. What's that?

Sign in to a Grapevine account for the full experience.

Discover More

Curated from across

img

Confessions on

by FreshRaita

Stealth

Two simple questions

1/ an employee has got a raise in his/her current org recently and then asks for raise again to switch to a different org 2/ an employee has got a raise in his/her current org recently, gets an offer from another org and then asks for the current org to match the offer What’s your first thought? Is this justified? 90% of orgs will label them as opportunistic, money hungry & capital centric. But let’s get brutally honest here: Is the talent wrong to ask for more? We’re quick to jump to conclusions and slap on those labels. But have you ever stopped to consider their perspective? They are leveraging their value in the market. They are pushing for what they believe they’re worth. Isn’t that exactly what we teach about knowing your value and not settling? Are we really being fair when we default to calling them greedy? How many of you would really go back to hard, clear benchmarking and justify why this ask is justified? How many of you are really fighting this battle of moving a godzilla out of their position (in this case, a manager) who just says, "Nai yaar... pagal hai kya... bolo same salary pe aane ke liye... abhi to raise mila hai"? Most likely (as it is today) that this will result in a no-go from a manager or a comp approval request. And when it does - you can go all gaga on how you sold opportunity cost, how you justified the value the candidate brings to the table and all that verbatim in my head translates to CONVENIENCE. Someones convenience. This will always labelled "outlier" case. {continued in comments}

img

Indian Startups on

by Brutallyhonest

Stealth

Job Market Reality Check

Recently, I interviewed a senior individual about their job hunting experience after 8 months, 50+ interviews, and interactions with 10+ companies. What they shared is quite eye-opening and worth sharing with my fellow Grapeviners to stay informed about the current market trends. There's a concerning trend of false interviews or what some might call "candidate fishing." Companies seem dissatisfied with many candidates they encounter initially, leading to rejections for trivial reasons or minor interview slip-ups. This indicates an oversupply of candidates in the market. Most companies have multiple candidates lined up for each job role, creating unnecessary backups. Consequently, last-minute job offer declines are not uncommon, even after successfully navigating through all interview rounds. The interview process itself can be lengthy, ranging from one to two months, with interviews scheduled during weekends, late nights, and early mornings becoming more common. Some common reasons for rejection include: 1. Diversity hiring concerns 2. Expectations of being a master of everything 3. Common interview formats with overwhelming ratios like 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1, putting candidates on the spot 4. Companies adopting a "Why should we not hire you?" mindset 5. Scrutiny over resume details, such as short job stints, despite ongoing industry layoffs 6. Negative assumptions about candidates from top tech companies (FAANG) looking for new roles 7. Rejections after multiple rounds (7-10 rounds) of interviews 8. Ghosting becoming a prevalent issue If you're experiencing these challenges, remember that you're not alone. Many others are facing similar issues. Hang in there; the tide will eventually turn.