Well to be honest we should have invaded srilanka, Maldives and Bhutan back in the 70s. Their population density is lower.
Srilanka and Maldives would serve as excellent millitary ports and good tourism revenue.
Not to mention you also have the right to all the resources 100 kilometres off the shore which can include oil reserves.
With Maldives we would have a huge chunk of Indian Ocean under control and no Chinese occupied military ports.
Bhutan would have been hard as China wouldn't let us occupy it but we could have made something work.
Bangladesh and Myanmar have more problems then benefits, best to leave as it is.
What do you think India would do with the people of those countries, offer them citizenship?
Yes. You just absorb the people. The new land mass gain can easily house the existing and more future population
Khud ke 150 crore to sambhal nahi rahe, aur add karlo
We are not that powerful bhai. Jo hai woh toh sambhaal lein..
I don't think power is an issue here , the only problem that can arise is the reaction of other countries due to such action
That's the point. Reaction hoga. Power hogi to reaction sambhal jaega. Power nahi hai isiliye nahi sambhlega.
User empathy pro Maxx Guys do you think this is done really to bring the issues or to gain traction. Not against this but everyone is trying to bcome ek din ka uber wla and Zomato wla etc . It's clear hyper local delivery, uber ola etc...
Hi friend,
I am sharing my personal life with you all.
Kindly address me what to do,
I was born in poor family, my father was a small business man my mother was a house wife.
In 90s my grandfather was in power to rule in ou...
Kalki: A Mixed Bag with an Environmental Message I recently saw Kalki with a friend, and the movie left me with mixed feelings. While the environmental message was clear and impactful, the stretched runtime and unsatisfying cliffhanger e...
