PeakXV (sequoia) should by RCB
PeakXV (sequoia) has a history of firing CEOs and changing leadership when they become an investor.
At least in this case they'll have full support.
They've had major fuck ups, but that's actually true for Sequoia US too (FTX etc)
I feel there's something else at play here too
Sequoia is splitting into 3 investment firms each serving US/Europe, China/SouthEast Asia and India respectively. Saw in the headlines it was mainly to address similar startups with competing products being funded by them.
Jhaad Nahi Uga dhang se, khatte nikle hein inke desi fal; Chale hein Beherupiye chadhne pahad Everest Bina kise ke sang.
Most likely LPs are not comfortable with Sequoia investing in the same companies from different vehicles. Sequoia most likely invests in growth stage Indian companies from both the Indian company as well as US/UK dedicated vehicle, similar to what other US-based VCs do.
Tell us more @marvel
PeakXV (sequoia) has a history of firing CEOs and changing leadership when they become an investor.
At least in this case they'll have full support.
Why do US VCs like Sequoia and Mattix rebrand to PeakXV and Z47 in India?
Is this just a politically correct way of exiting the market after realising India is not doing well for them?