To explain.
It's not that 'Philanthropy is a cakewalk'. Tata is set up in a way that much of the profits go to Tata Trust (60% from what I read). This is a significant departure from the philanthropy that any other business does.
Business makes X. Founders make 10-20% of X. They do philanthropy on this. Tata does 0.6 of X. It's very different.
This philanthropy has led to some very great institutions in India (TIFR, Tata Cancer Research, Space etc.)
Hence much greater love than Rothschild/Carnegie etc.
Because the company feels fundamentally different and has a track record to show for it. Plus the person was always respected for his presence.
Ultimately, there will be black spots in a business. People will be underpaid. And so we should not put them on the highest pedestal. Just appreciate for being better than 99% of businessmen.