ZestyDonut
ZestyDonut

Journalism in India is a joke at this point.

These journalists are not even cross checking any news.

Headlines are coming out from someone’s tweet or Instagram post. Poonam pandey’s news is one of the example.

People reading this posts, please do your own due diligence and stop relying on these news portals.

10mo ago
Find out if you are being paid fairly.Download Grapevine
SillyHamster
SillyHamster

We share the same parents. My mom is a tenured professor at WhatsApp university, with a paper in YT sensationalism

ZestyDonut
ZestyDonut

My father is convinced by Youtube shorts that he can cure diabetes by grinding grass roots

SillyHamster
SillyHamster

Let me know if it works. I’ll go and get my own grass 👀🚬

ZestyQuokka
ZestyQuokka

Someone please tell parents too 🙏 They have started believe YT videos now, after WA forwards

ZestyQuokka
ZestyQuokka

believing*

ZestyDonut
ZestyDonut

Youtube Reels addiction is beyond par now

JumpyRaccoon
JumpyRaccoon

Been almost a decade since national news channels started picking up tweets as news. That's how Twitter went on to become a powerful medium despite having the least user count among all the popular social media in India. An entire narrative can now be spun by just using a few influencers and bots thereby creating an echo chamber, and news channels would just grab them and take it further to the masses.

ZestyDonut
ZestyDonut

Totally man. People’s busy schedule and dependence on Social media is messing up

QuirkyPenguin
QuirkyPenguin

I’m a journalist, and I agree the state of media currently isn’t great.

However, there are other nuances people outside the industry rarely understand. In Poonam Pandey’s case, it was something that came from her official account and her manager confirmed.

News like that is time sensitive and competitive. Something coming from officials channels is taken as trust worthy, while at the same time, the source is also mentioned within the story.

There are multiple stages in which a story develops. The first one is to immediately report what we know - if it is coming from her official insta account, we say as much to the reader.

Then reporters try to reach out to the source and find out what are the later developments. If they were intentionally doing this, Poonam’s team would completely cut off any communications with media.

And yes, with some more time, reporters would try to dig in more and try to verify it and update the story. But a news organisation cannot wait until they see someone’s dead body to report it right? by then the news would be stale and one would lose out to competitors.

A reader need should also take some effort the see the whole story (which cites the source etc.) and not just skim through headlines. And yes, headlines are being made sensational now for more clicks. That’s sadly the state of affairs - in a digital world, competition intensity is much higher and nobody is willing to pay for news.

ZestyDonut
ZestyDonut

You are correct. Media is more into competition now a days.

FloatingMuffin
FloatingMuffin
Google10mo

The worst offender is wire, which intentionally spreads fake news. They reported that US has banned the sales of drones to India due to the pannum assassination. The very next day, US government approved the sales

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-68150918.amp

Discover more
Curated from across