img

Who do anonymous forums like Grapevine tend to become negative?

There are a few psychological and sociological theories that can help explain why anonymous forums may naturally tend towards negativity. The separation from real-life consequences can result in people saying or doing things they wouldn't normally do, which can sometimes lead to negative behavior. Some individuals derive satisfaction from creating conflict or distress for others online aka "trolling". Anonymous forums provide a fertile ground for trolls as they can typically act without direct consequences. The larger the crowd, the less likely individuals are to take responsibility for a situation. In an anonymous forum, people might be less likely to step in and stop negative behavior, leading to a proliferation of such behavior. Overtime this forum will see bots to promote propaganda of one company or to spread shit about other companies. As a community there should be something around guidelines, rules, and constructs to reduce this. What are some of your suggestions?

img

Frequency9379

Self Employed

a year ago

img

ChiefOat83

Swiggy

a year ago

img

Frequency9379

Self Employed

a year ago

img

AlphaGrindset

Series A Startup

a year ago

img

ChiefOat83

Swiggy

a year ago

img

AlphaGrindset

Series A Startup

a year ago

img

GoodMafia

Stealth

a year ago

img

potatomato

Fintech Startup

a year ago

img

ChiefOat83

Swiggy

a year ago

img

BiryaniEnthu

Stealth

a year ago

img

AlphaGrindset

Series A Startup

a year ago

img

Spartan101

Stealth

a year ago

img

Akira

Unemployed

a year ago

img

ChiefOat83

Swiggy

a year ago

img

WideScene

INDMoney

a year ago

See more comments
Sign in to a Grapevine account for the full experience.

Discover More

Curated from across

img

Misc on

by BiryaniEnthu

Stealth

[Long Post] I think I understand why Grapevine works well.

Itā€™s therapeutic because you can share different aspects of your life that you canā€™t talk about on other platforms. For instance, you can't criticize the Ola CEO on LinkedIn, demand justice for the Kolkata rape case on Twitter without getting a notice from the Kolkata police, or express unhappiness on Instagram because thatā€™s not the vibe of that platform. But on Grapevine, you can do all of this and more. Funny enough, Iā€™ve been able to analyze different aspects of my personality (and all my different personalities). My brain works a lot, I talk a lot, and I think a lot. Over the past year, I've realized I see things very differently than how society, media, or authorities expect me to. Grapevine has been a tool for understanding myself better. I can share a thought, and maybe 15 people will respondā€”some agreeing, some disagreeing, and a few might even call me names. But thatā€™s okay, thatā€™s just how they function. All part of self-discovery. Another thing I appreciate about Grapevine is that it removes the halo effect we often have. Our names, colleges, and companies are masked (some who haven't revealed them), reducing the blurring of judgments. We connect with people on a more human-to-human level. Grapevine is great if you're looking to find a partner, lover, or simply make new friends and expand your network. You can be yourself, and the people who know you here often know you better than those you meet at college, work, or even within your family.

img

Indian Startups on

by AlphaGrindset

Series A Startup

The Generalist - #1: Why you should not stay only in startups

Hi folks, thinking of writing a regular mini blog here about my learnings being a generalist in the ecosystem. I currently handle growth at an ecom startup and have previously been through 2-3 startups + a large corporate in my 7 year career. #1: Why you should not stay only in startups Recently started reflecting on salaries of many peers who are also startup folks and trying to see where it stands. There are 3 cohorts: a. People who started out in Big 4/Corporate & then became a generalist: They've been underpaid the most. First pay was 4-5L, and when they transitioned to startups, started at 7-9L. Over time, growing from there is difficult without MBA. b. People who have forever been in startups: They earn more than A on average. But here too, there is a delta in their salaries vs. people with same YoE who went to an MBA and are in corporate now. Side note: I've seen this cohort has usually loved what they've done, and being in startups definitely has positively impacted their thought process. c. People who went to a corporate/big tech etc. mid way: This cohort has done the best long term. Their pay got recalibrated when they went to a larger company in the middle through their career, and when they rejoined startups, they were respected more in salary negotiation. This is to anybody out there who is a generalist and sees a similar path. Try to sandwich a proper, large company in your career. It gives you perspective on whether you like it and if startups is really your preferred route. And it also recalibrates your pay. Startups will limit you basis your last salary. Corporates have standards basis bands. Just something to think over. NOTE: Do share feedback, if this makes sense. And if you'd like to read more of these too.