I just saw the note at the bottom right. How did they not see anything wrong in this? A razor (cosmetic) brand putting a full fucking front page ad on such a topic is just awful.
That line is the only thing that completely destroys this entire ad what could have otherwise passed off as a decent tribute.
I understood the reference but don't find it offensive 🤐 what am I missing
At the bottom right, they're promoting their product. It's shameful to misuse such an incident.
Wasn't offensive till the main ad copy. But the sub copy brings the focus back to her facial hair and also talks about their razor which makes it salesy and ridiculous!
This ad shouldn't have happened in the first place and making use of an opportunity where a child was getting trolled for her facial hair. This is cheap and opportunistic. It's like when a group of people are beating the child, this ad too in the name of supporting her joins the group and beats her furthermore.
The copy got what it wanted. Hate and attention.