BubblyDonut
BubblyDonut

Only in India

Only in India will someone speaking scientific fact and sense against age-old myths can get banned by court orders on X

Post image
14mo ago
Find out if you are being paid fairly.Download Grapevine
QuirkyMarshmallow
QuirkyMarshmallow

He is not balanced. He extrapolates medical terminology to prove his point. There are frauds everywhere but he is no saint either. Good riddiance

MagicalBurrito
MagicalBurrito
Swiggy14mo

THIS.
Stupid mentality (and people) like this enables these huge corporates to initiate such actions. Garbage woke shit to have everything balanced.

QuirkyMarshmallow
QuirkyMarshmallow

One of us is stupid here and it is not me

GroovyBoba
GroovyBoba

If you're using any Himalaya or patanjali product then you need to immediately stop and throw that trash out.

BubblyDonut
BubblyDonut

My friend, you will be surprised to know the number of educated people that believe in and support those products and methodologies.

This also reminds me of Aman Gupta from Shark Tank openly advertising his belief in such companies and investing in them.

GroovyBoba
GroovyBoba

That's why I hate people. Anything that is not peer reviewed by multiple parties and reproducible is sudo-science aka bakwas

BubblyWaffle
BubblyWaffle
Amazon14mo

The Liver Doc is biased. I won't say Liver Doc's points are baseless but he is prejudiced.

  1. He used scientific articles to prove that Ayurvedic treatment is shit. People may get liver failure if they ingest too many shitty ayurvedic medicines. I agree, totally.
  2. When I replied to one of his tweets, that a person had liver failure after ingesting so called 'scientifically proven' allopathic medicines, he blocked me. Why so, if he is spreading good message to the humanity?
  3. I agree there are numerous examples where ayurvedic treatments caused liver failure problems. But, so do people get liver problems after having 'scientifically proven' treatments.
  4. His usage of words is not good. He will verbally abuse anyone who say anything to defend Ayurvedic treatment.
ZoomyPickle
ZoomyPickle

Just one question. Should his account be withheld for any of the points you just made?

If you think the answer is yes, then you're fundamentally against free speech.

BubblyDonut
BubblyDonut

V good question @DevilInTheDetails

DancingBanana
DancingBanana

Hahaha, he refused to accept that medicinal herbs exists. He wanted everyone to refuse ayurveda and use only allopathy. He blocked everyone who said both are good. Refusing to acknowledge the evidence of ayurveda is totally opposite of science. Good to see him temporarily blocked

ZoomyPickle
ZoomyPickle

You're 100% incorrect about everything you said. He has in fact agreed about the potential vitality & medicinal nature of herbs used in Ayurveda, but that does not absolve the mountain of evidence against its misuse & toxicology.

Please don't make baseless claims, if you're not in the know about the subject matter.

JumpyPretzel
JumpyPretzel

You are making baseless claims here. He didn’t block Ayurveda supporting guys. He used to block only the abusive folks. I myself had opposed him many times.

SwirlyRaccoon
SwirlyRaccoon
Target14mo

The judiciary would stand with Ayurveda companies itself, irrespective of how fatal they may be 🥲

BubblyDonut
BubblyDonut

Yeah, that’s the problem of mentality in this country.

This guy was a big threat to all the companies that need to peddle age-old myths and lies to sell products. Sadly, we have a majority of people that believe in those myths and lies.

ZoomyJellybean
ZoomyJellybean

Count one myth first.

Discover more
Curated from across