WeepyDwarf
WeepyDwarf

Should I keep switching after every 2 year

Me thinking to switch after every 2 years max, for bettter opportunity 🤟, and better hike. Because eventually after 1-2 year, you reach saturation point.

My concern is It is good to switch to new company even if current company is really good with you in all the way possible.... Except giving salary hike😔

14mo ago
BorrowerBadshah
BorrowerBadshah

Your value at a company really compounds if you stick longer. You would switch, get hike and then stagnant for next few cycles and then repeat.

LooseGoose
LooseGoose

+1. Appraisal hikes are small compared to promotion hikes. Can't get promotion unless you work longer than a few years.

Based1776
Based1776
Remote14mo

Yeah but salary growth through job switched are even higher

Ghunghroo
Ghunghroo

In my opinion, it takes you 1 year to just understand how a company works, what they value, what internal systems are like.

After a year is when you can actually make an impact inside of a company.

If you've found a good company (more so if it's a good start up with sorted basics and good leadership team) - stick around for 2-3 years. You'll see more growth.

It's not always about the money :)

FunkySaint
FunkySaint

Concur.

RamsayBrothers
RamsayBrothers

Jitna Maan hai switch karo...regret baad mein..

FunkySaint
FunkySaint

Honestly the job market is catching up to the boom, stable candidates will soon be preferred.

Heard from a CBO - folks nowadays just shift companies in a year to the next level when they haven't even delivered in their current role. How can you deliver results in 1 year??? Market was different earlier, but now, we have 100's of options. But yes, will need patience to sift through 500 resumes

Discover more
Curated from across