Stop spamming man.
Anyone who has watched the clip can figure out what he was saying. He had three things:
- He was pissed because he had to make notes again now that the laws have changed.
- He said vote for educated people who don't just change laws because they can or change names. What this insinuates is obvious. That those who changed the law are uneducated. And who reformed the laws? One political party.
- He did not provide any reason to why the law reforms weren't good or raise any valid reason against them. As such, these were his personal opinions and his biased opinions.
Conclusion:
As an educator, his job is to provide both sides of the argument and let students decide for themselves. Not bring his personal opinion in.
Last, it doesn't matter how many times you and your ilk claim that he was fired for asking students to vote for 'educated' leaders but it doesn't really take education to understand his bias and who he called uneducated.