First principle - “Lending is a business of collection, not distribution!”
Some of the players those who got bust in recent past focused entirely on distribution. Collections never got attention even in product development cycles. I know some folks those who took money from such BNPL players and returned ZERO money. Zestmoney is one such example of company with mountain of NPAs
Second - “Some businesses by nature itself are boring”🥱
Retail lending is nothing new, old banks are running this business for many decades profitably. Adding some friction to lending journeys give time for lender/borrower to learn more about each-other. The zip-zap disbursals by BNPL players left small time for everyone to realise the seriousness of money.
So if I have to build a new BNPL, I will focus on the above two levers -
- Ensure collections are figured out clearly with phygital infrastructure in place.
- Introduce some frictions for borrowers, let’s say not letting them utilise the full limits, break the limits in smaller chunks. Periodic revisions of limits using tech.
Let me know if this makes any sense!