Software Engineering: Where 'Good Enough' Isn't Good Enough for Recruiters
Hey fellow devs,
I'm a software engineer and I'm getting tired of the disconnect between the skills recruiters expect and the skills actually required for the job.
In my daily work, I solve problems that are mostly straightforward and don't require extreme problem-solving skills. But whenever I apply for a new role or get approached by recruiters, they always ask for "expert-level" problem-solving abilities, even when the product or service doesn't seem to demand it.
It feels like they're looking for someone to solve world hunger, when in reality, the job is more about maintaining and improving existing systems.
Has anyone else experienced this? Am I just being too salty, or is this a real phenomenon?
Share your thoughts fellow devs.
It's a typical demand supply problem. When there are a large number of devs willing to work for that company/pay, such skyrocketed expectations arise.
I'm not trying to justify it. Just trying to explain the reason.
"I see your point, but don't you think it's a bit too easy to dismiss the value of advanced problem-solving skills in favor of 'good enough' solutions?"
Years of Experience is killing me
RANT ALERT
I am a Software Engineer with 2 YoE. Wherever I apply they ask for 3+ or 5+ YoE minimum. I am hardly eligible for any roles. To one recruiter I really got angry and said "What is it that you believe 3+YoE candidates can do an...
Are recruiters (headhunters) just glorified gatekeepers?
The worst part about applying for a job is the process of impressing the dumb recruiter so that she sets up your interview. It is funny when a recruiter who has zero technical skills and has not written a single line of code in her life ...