I see candidates with 2-4 years earning in 20LPA+ whereas sales and marketing folks who sit with 4-8LPA tops. Isn't the disparity too much?
Happy to see this question.
It's about scalability. A developer sitting with a laptop has the potential to effect more changes in revenue than a salesperson. This difference is especially massive in lower and mid level roles. As you go up the ladder, sales and marketing roles pick up speed and to be specific, CXO roles in Business and Product are paid equally in most sectors.
Example of scale: A developer deploying an app feature for push notification has the potential to change the revenue across the entire user base of the app. A sales person who is dealing with a customer (B2B or B2C) has potential to only get that 1/10/100 orders at maximum.
But a marketer (copywriter) with the write copy can also double your revenue with just a few words?
A sales person/marketer/product specialist/developer advocate presenting your product in a conference can drive more revenue/eyeballs than a developer coding and those persons seem to be often paid more than the junior or mid senior developer.
Simple supply demand equation! Everyone believes they know sales and marketing and don’t know about IT/Tech. Formal training is essential for tech knowledge.
Sales and marketing encompasses much more human psychology, personality. Relationships than tech for that matter. Whereas tech only has to solve problems which sales and marketing also do.
Not really. Marketing and sales are roles with challenges, agreed but to be a good developer the amount of effort required is very high.
Sales and Marketing are not paid as much as tech ON AVERAGE. In a longer run, Sales and Marketing Heads who actually drum up the revenue gets 2x-4x of what a Tech Head at an company which has achieved PMF.
Good to know! I haven't come across any roles above $280K dollars even in foreign companies for director roles in marketing. But can easily find $500k software developer roles in top companies.
I'd say it's about the impact for 1. But the major reason is, bcoz few companies started to pay top money. So, if others wanted best candidates, they had to match the offer. I don't agree that it guys don't deserve that much. I'd say, every other fields should level up their pay by figuring out avenues of making money
Well said. Demand supply has ruined sales and marketing and people are ready to work for peanuts. Even though tech also has a lot of supply..demand continues to catch up.
Tech doesn't have quality supply. It's the even today. When you have some niche skills, you can demand literally anything and they will pay
There’s just lesser demand to sell software and more demand to make software.
There’s far too many companies in the build phase.
And even finally if you build it right - the customers will come automatically. Sellers/marketeers may not be needed
So are you saying that there is no place for sales and marketing in the future? But who will write the content and pitch to customers for non-saas services?
Hi non tech person here. Wondering how such inflated salaries in tech will survive in comparison to salaries of say marketing or sales in an organisation. The bubble seems to be bursting but will love you know the thoughts of tech peopl...
I have been actively applying for marketing jobs, the situation seems very dismal. Packages are pretty low, companies are not ready to pay above 12 lpa.
Without an MBA, you will suffer. With an MBA, you will suffer but will have a loan ...
Young SWE start with double digit salaries, while someone in Non tech will need 5-10 years to reach that level Even the business roles, the direct revenue generating roles don't pay good traditionally
Funny how techies think everyone...
Engineers deserve their pay. 1 - The code that engineers write are assets of a company. The code might keep run...
