img

Volunteering experience-Productfolks

Hello everyone, I wanted to step in and shed light on the volunteering culture at Productfolks. TLDR: It's the most toxic one. Don't join!!! To begin with, they periodically post fellowship ads where completing an assignment is required for entry. Then, they mention that volunteering for one month is necessary before conversion. That makes sense. However, what they fail to mention is that you need to dedicate at least 8-9 hours daily(!!!) to be considered for conversion to a fellow. Currently, there are fewer than 10 fellows, while the number of volunteers is at least 4 times that because they want to continue EXPLOITING ppl. As a result, NO ONE gets converted. They claim to be a non-profit, but trust me, there's a lot of money flowing into the community, or perhaps just into the founders' pockets - especially looking at Suhas. When you volunteer, they treat you poorly, expect unrealistic time commitments, overload you with work, and hold you excessively accountable for things they need scapegoats for. It's a culture where you regret ever getting involved because the work mainly involves operations that consume time, and the opportunities for learning are very limited. Not to mention the expectations that force you to sacrifice your days for menial tasks. It might be okay for the tag, but I strongly suggest against volunteering. The community seems pleasant from the consumer end, and that's as much involvement as I would recommend

img

SlimyCaper

Amazon

4 months ago

img

DarlesChickens

Razorpay

4 months ago

Sign in to a Grapevine account for the full experience.

Discover More

Curated from across

img

Office Gossip on

by StablePint

Early Stage Startup

Rant post

Joined this organization as an SDE. Initially, had a great experience for the first few months, got to learn a lot. However, eventually, the management (co-founder) started showing his true colors where they would favor a few people who would say yes to everything the co-founder had to say, while others who asked for justification would suffer. One such issue is the lack of concrete documentation for policies, and surprise, surprise, the policies change based on the mood of the founders. HR, oh, where can I begin? I honestly haven't seen them work, other than salary processing, where they have outsourced their work like LinkedIn management and basic tasks such as wishing employees on their birthdays. This is perfectly fine with the co-founder, as he considers this innovative. Unnecessarily, we are forced to follow processes that hamper productivity, and we have to attend meetings for half the day. Still, they expect us to work for more than 10 hours when the salary is peanuts—hell, even peanuts are better; at least we can have them with alcohol. My learning is saturated, and there’s no zeal to learn as the manager and others demotivate you. The most frustrating part is the quarterly rewards, which make no sense, as the rewards are given to people who can appease their managers (confirmed). And now that we have increments incoming, they have all of a sudden started highlighting mistakes, finding mistakes even if they don’t exist. Like one such example was the co-founder asking us to write a script when the script was already shown, and asking for an update on a JIRA ticket when it was already given in the comments. They lost my respect when they started canceling people’s PTOs and disturbing people on their much-needed PTOs where they spend time with their families and unwind. The co-founder asks the PO to call and disturb the developer on their much-needed vacations after working for long hours and weekends as he wants to satisfy his ego.