
Layoff proof
How can we be layoff proof even companies like Citi , Barclays , google are firing people
Employees who are top performers are laid off. Employees who are in a firm for a long time are laid off. Employees who are freshers are laid off. Employees from IIMs/IITs are laid off. Employees who work just to get the job done are laid off. Seniors are laid off. Juniors are laid off Hard working employees who get good ratings and give extra hours are laid off. Bad peforming ones are obviously laid off.
Is there anyone who is safe. It's just at the mercy of few decision makers at the top and no matter what you do you will never be safe.
Now I understand why parents say that government job is better.
No, govt jobs aren’t better.
It all depends on an individual choice.
But at least you will get job security. And now after 7th pay commission, pay is also good there. The only con is transfer and posting at rural locations.
Job security - Tech cycles are temporary & narrow. We saw similar pain in 2008-09 but after that for many years it was a boom cycle. I have many examples where people in govt jobs work in abusive environments just because of this mental bloc. People do leave coveted govt jobs as well.
Compensation - If you are in tech and top 20% percentile, you can make money in 10 years which you can make in a 40 yrs of govt job.
Availability- so many waste so many productive years just to get that job, worst is if you are from non-reserved categories
Tech jobs - As most of the junta here comes from tech background, tell me a single govt job which gives u chance to explore, build and deliver. I know some people will come up with ISRO, anything apart from that??
Pattern is all the fat salaried ones get laid off first..that the first step that saves cash flow in any firm that shows immediate results.
And what do u consider fat salary? It will be very subjective. 30-40 Lacs in Google might not be a fat salary But in a service based firm that's what leadership people earn.
Fat salary depends on cash flow and runway that firm has! Or depends on profits promised to the management.. it's all relative
Be in the main revenue generating business unit of a company with growing cash flow. You should be relatively safe.
But sometimes u can't choose the BU u want to be part of.
For example after college placements, students are alloted BUs based on availablity. Roles such as HR, PM are always cost center and not revenue center. When the product is in the build phase PMs are quite necessary. But once the product is built you don't need that many PMs.
The person who's layoff will have the least impact on the ongoing projects is fired first.
Every project is given a target based on its % contribution to overall revenue. More firing happen in projects that contribute the least revenue.
Senior, junior, performer, non performer is not the criteria.
Everyone is vulnerable, those who perform or not perform doesn’t matter. All that matters to management is if they can save money by firing talent during recession, they will. Because in a country like India, there is no dearth for people willing to work for less salary. And when market resumes back in good shape, companies can always hire back good talent with decent enough packages. This a cycle and we are a part of this hire and fire game. That’s it, keep it simple and for an employee’s salary, don’t take stress of a CEO.
Yes thats 100% correct.
One pattern I have seen is that the ones who speak up against the leadership. They are almost always the first ones to go during layoffs.
Total Compensation vs Critical Dependencies is the key pattern on all layoffs
Employees who have relatively high salary are laid off generally
You have to break the by cases. You won't be able to find a pattern by looking at aggregate numbers. Atleast one thing that's common is that anyone with a fat salary (higher than market average or not worth the outcome) will be laid off first.
A startup whose BU had to be shut down might see layoffs across all salary brackets, roles, background, etc.
While another startup who is running low on cash might lay off only the high salaried individuals and try to squeeze the same level of output from cheaper employees
How can we be layoff proof even companies like Citi , Barclays , google are firing people
Hi Grapeviners, in the interes of the wider community, requesting you all to kindly let all of us know if there are any safest companies to work for with decent compensation.
Also, would like to know if any sector in tech is immune to ...
Context: Worked at a boutique consulting firm this summer and loved it, especially my team and my manager who was very empathetic and caring. Received a PPO.
Problem: Given family financial circumstances (primarily) I had to think beyon...