A lot of noise around AI taking coding jobs, which i fear might be real. Like not completely but you get my point. So how should one upskill themselves (especially the average folks, top 1/2% will not be affected in any field imo) for the upcoming shift? Like will data analytics/science or maybe ai/ml engineering jobs be on rise ? Should be start upskilling in those fields or any other suggestions? I would really like to know it from someone who has good experience in the industry or someone with good insight. Thanks
Don't know why I expected the comments to be anything but shitty insufferably bad jokes.
I've posted a serious answer now after reading your comment. I realised most people must be feeling anxious and looking for answers.
True! Everyone’s pun cofficient goes off the roof on each post. Everyone wants to be an anonymous digital comedian here on GV
Manual scavenging
Just that this time it won't only be lower castes
We already have automation in developed countries that does this. It's just too costly now to be omnipresent.
Once we're intelligent enough to solve the high-dimensional math problem of global supply chain optimisation as well as intelligent enough to discover new cheaper energy paradigms (nuclear fusion, wink wink) - such machines will be very very cheap and made globally available to maximise profits for the corporations building them. That intelligence will be AGI or someone using AGI.
Average folks? Become the 1-2%!
Doesn’t make sense, the average will keep changing with every addition to the top 1%, neither you nor me are in top 1-2% even right now, else we both would have been working on product that are actually bringing in the change. its like saying “oh you are depressed, don’t be!”
Not really, average will change when the people actually wish to move to top 1% and are ready to put in the effort and that there's No additional influx of average engineers. But that's just not true. Every year we have more and more mediocre engineers, but not many in top 1%. If it was really that easy, it wouldn't be called top 1%
Also, it's a wrong thing to say that you are only top 1% if you are bringing in some change. It's the most pathetic argument I have ever heard.
People aren't in top 1% not because of them bringing change with product, but because they are mediocre. As simple as that!
And the argument about depression is wrong as well. Based on what I said, it could mean, you are depressed, you have identified the problem and you know that this solution is what would work. Hence, solving for it is the thing to do!
Maybe HR? Somehow I find the idea of the HR department positions replaced by AI plain wrong. Would be incredibly ironic though.
What HR? when no one is there needed to hire what will hr do? They will get replaced first.
Literally gave an AI interview last week
Chatting with a friend at Ather and they're literally begging for AI talent. apparently AI skills can bump up salary by 50%+ and it's not just about the cash, ppl think it'll improve job efficiency and career advancement too. been seeing...
I have seen LLM models getting better day by day and seem to replace a lot of tedious roles that interns would do. How will this change the job market over time? Should people start learning coding to stay relevant in today's times? How ...
Can Ai take product jobs? Been planning to switch to either PRODUCT or DATA SCIENCE roles in 5/6 months, but kinda skeptical as what path I should go ahead with. Also with the AI advancing everyday and some tech bros taking about AI taki...
