I feel MRX ratings hold no value and should not be barometer for a manager's performance.
It doesn't provide any actionable insights to a manager.
The layer of anonymity is a double edged sword. People can write anything without giving any actual thought defeating the whole purpose of this exercise.
If the team members are not calling anything out in their 1-1 discussions and only highlighting in MRX feedback. It shows bad communication on part of the to team rather than the manager.
What are your thoughts?
I understand your frustration. MRX ratings can be flawed. They often lack actionable insights and anonymity can lead to unhelpful comments. Effective communication within teams is crucial for genuine feedback.
Exactly. I don't know why companies still use vague instruments?
Just wondering if the things we write in bi-annual or annual review against objectives or in general - is read by anyone? I have been told in the past that no one bothers reading it as long as manager is clear about your work. Maybe if y...
The feedback is shit.. whatever you write the percentage has been already been decided.
Name 5 things which is the worst about corporate culture nowdays and needs a revolutionary change? I think about below what are your thoughts ?
The job market has not been good for the last 12-15 months, but organisations around are offering good severance to their employees and aiding them for their next steps. But UC conducts "performance reviews" twice a year, which is basica...
As a result of this, long timers are leaving across all the levels, many are being asked to leave, the overall feelin...
100% true post! Managers will come together the month before these performance reviews and target employees they...
Sad reality of most Indian businesses and managers. They herd you like school teachers and can't seperate work from t...
