I feel MRX ratings hold no value and should not be barometer for a manager's performance.
It doesn't provide any actionable insights to a manager.
The layer of anonymity is a double edged sword. People can write anything without giving any actual thought defeating the whole purpose of this exercise.
If the team members are not calling anything out in their 1-1 discussions and only highlighting in MRX feedback. It shows bad communication on part of the to team rather than the manager.
What are your thoughts?
I understand your frustration. MRX ratings can be flawed. They often lack actionable insights and anonymity can lead to unhelpful comments. Effective communication within teams is crucial for genuine feedback.
Exactly. I don't know why companies still use vague instruments?
Just wondering if the things we write in bi-annual or annual review against objectives or in general - is read by anyone? I have been told in the past that no one bothers reading it as long as manager is clear about your work. Maybe if y...
Name 5 things which is the worst about corporate culture nowdays and needs a revolutionary change? I think about below what are your thoughts ?
In the recent performance review, shitty manager gave bad review. Though worked very hard the last whole year. Brought this to skips notice, but he's not ready to hear what I have to say, just speaks what manager has to say ( probably...
There should be an open forum to rate different managers anonymously so that anyone joining the company could get a hint of the kind of people they'd be reporting.
Thoughts ?
