I am not doubting that.
Its not just about being good, it's also about being good in which domain. One can be very good at software development and another can be really good at shoe repairing. That doesn't mean the shoe repairer gets as much money as the software engineer. I hope one understands that this analogy is not to degrade any job role but only to express the importance or value of a domain as a whole.
Something like UI designing is no way a high level job or anything, it never was, more so with today's many free AI options.
Money is and should always be directly proportional to the level of difficulty, hardness and effort required to be skillful in something. UI designing, content and all these other related stuff can never qualify as something hard or difficult or high barrier skill like software development or product management or data analyst or investment bankers etc.
Hence, for me, to me, it will never make sense if any designer is getting anything more than 25 lpa (for the most senior folks - 10-15+ YoE). For the starters, it should be capped within 5 lpa at max (if i were the decider)